By George Sibley from Mountain Gazette No. 155 - May 2009
Photo by Mark Stemm
It was a miserable morning in
a transcendent landscape. We huddled
in the rafts under a steady businesslike
rain, learning about all the
leaks in our waterproof gear, while
looking out and up to waterfall after
waterfall, waterfalls coming freefall
in 500- or 1,000-foot leaps over the great
limestone walls in the lower Grand Canyon.
Shifting convocations of mist, fragments
of clouds drifted through and died against
the walls; occasionally rocks rattled down
the walls, startling us and plopping into the
river; but mostly we just huddled, stunned
by the wet chill and that great gray dream
of beauty as hours, miles passed and the
waterfalls kept appearing around each turn
and bend of the river till we were no longer
amazed, and just wondered when or if it
would stop raining but not really hoping
for that, knowing that the waterfalls would
also stop.
We'd been lucky that morning; we’d woken
to a threatening sky, but managed to
get breakfasted and all packed up and ready
to go before it started to rain. We were one
of those instant societies that come together
for a couple three weeks in the Grand
Canyon twenty-some of us, under the
guidance of half a dozen members of the
tribe of boatmen (two of ours were women).
Some of us were small clumps of couples
and friends traveling together, but all of
us had been strangers to most of the rest
of us when we'd started from Lee's Ferry
two weeks before the day of the thousand
thousand-foot waterfalls. We were by then
already well into the social sorting of genuines
to be enjoyed, creatives to be followed,
incompetents to be helped, arrogants to be tolerated, and the like, as we went with the
river by day and a sandbar by night, setting
up a movable feast every evening, ephemeral
civilization at the bottom of the debris
and chaos of ever-moving water, air and
rock that is the Grand Canyon.
I was officially there as a “boatman’s assistant”
thanks to Brad Dimock, a fellow
writer and friend whose life has been intimately
involved with the Grand Canyon for
35 years. “Assistant” meant I sliced and diced
as prep cook, did dishes, hauled the groover
and otherwise made myself useful at our
nightly civilization-on-a-sandbar. Beyond
that, I was just a passenger, which was fine
with me and everyone else no responsibilities
out on the river itself, thank god.
But that morning the rain began
around 8:30, abrupt and hard, just as the
boatmen were lashing the last drybags
down. The groover was already aboard a
sure sign of imminent departure. But it
was raining hard enough that they sent us
back up the beach to wait it out, under an
overhang because of possible falling rocks.
We stayed there maybe 45 minutes, and
watched the world change before us.
Immediately across the river, we saw water
begin to trickle in a little pinkish stream
out of a notch 80 or 100 feet high, splash
down onto a sloped ledge 20 feet above the
river, then off that into the river. But the
trickle began quickly to grow in size, and
then we saw another fall start above that
one, feeding into it, that second fall what,
300 feet above us? 500? John Wesley
Powell carried surveying instruments that
let him estimate heights more accurately
down there, but I just guessed, and then
discounted my guesses 25-percent because I prefer understatement to hyperbole.
Then we saw yet a third waterfall start
from the distant top of the visible canyon, at
first just a thin thread of white falling free
the full height of the tallest limestone, and
within minutes, growing to something very
much like the pictures of Yosemite's bigwall
waterfalls. A few hundred feet downstream
from that one, another waterfall came over
the rim, and then as far downriver as we
could see through the rain and mist, waterfall
after waterfall …
Meanwhile, within 15 or 20 minutes,
the river changed: The translucent green
water we'd floated on for two weeks became
an opaque red slurry that was visibly rising
as we watched. And our triple waterfall right
across the river grew redder as more water came down; the top one stayed pink, but
the one off the next-lower wall turned red,
and the one closest to us began to look like
a great spill of blood the thick brownishred
that blood is while it's still inside. Its
volume both quantity and sound was
huge and intense as it pounded on the
bottom ledge; there was no further mystery
about how water could carve rock
down there, or more accurately, beat it to
sand although what pounded down on
the ledge looked and sounded like something
closer to mud than water.
The rain eventually settled down to a
steady but less imposing downpour, and the
boatmen decided we might as well head on
down the river. Just a quarter-mile downstream,
Brad shipped his oars to take a picture; the boatmen have an “adopt-a-beach”
program whereby they take pictures of the
same beach every time they go past it, to
monitor changes, and his beach was he
thought just ahead.
But after a minute, he got a funny look
on his face. “It's gone,” he said. He pointed
out the place where it had been, his last trip
only three weeks earlier; now it was gone,
the last of it possibly washing out only a
few minutes before we got there.
What is it about a waterfall that is so
mesmerizing? It’s something to do with the
release, the letting-go that we mistake for
freedom. And leaping down like these were,
in 200-, 500-, 1,000-foot freefalls something
to do with excess too, or maybe just
extravagant abundance, all that potential energy
being just exuberantly, flagrantly
flaunted in sheer beauty.
I do not know if there were really 1,000 of
them; I didn't count; I was too busy watching
them, and thus may have succumbed
to hyperbole after all, a common problem
in the canyons.
Despite having studied and written about
“the Colorado Rivers,” Upper and Lower, on
and off for the past 30 years mostly more
political stuff and having a deep abiding
fascination with all of its manifestations in
the life of the American Southwest, it was my
first time on the river through the Grand
Canyon the “Middle Colorado” which
makes me shy about writing on it, being just
a tourist.
Furthermore, it’ll probably get me thrown out of this broadshouldered magazine
to confess it, but I didn’t enjoy the rapids.
I’m not a water person a sinker, not a
swimmer; and getting whapped head-on by
a few hundred gallons of cold water became
a marginal idea of fun. Sliding down the
tongue of every rapid feeling the water
pick up the raft the way the lift cable picks
up a quad chair at a ski area, to carry us
into a place where I couldn’t really believe
the boatmen had much control over what
happened the only thing more rapid than
the rapid was me rapidly praying to any god
or gods lurking down there in the basement
chaos of creation.
Brad who has been down rivers all
over the Western Hemisphere says the
Colorado’s rapids are not “mean or angry,”
they are just “big and jumpy,” but “angry”
or “jumpy” is a pretty fine distinction when
you’re sliding down one standing wave
into a trough and looking up at the ten-foot
thrashing wall of the next wave you’re either
going to go up or through or some of both.
I was lucky we only had one close call
where I found myself standing on one tube
trying to push the tube on the other side
back down from near vertical to horizontal.
Then the standing wave stood down or
something I have no delusions about having
successfully flattened it myself and
we were ejected from the rapid (minus our
boatman, who was thrown overboard), more
or less horizontal with me again sprawled
in the bottom of the raft.
I most enjoyed the long calm stretches
where the river sometimes hardly seemed to
be moving and was, in fact, often moving
back upstream in subtle eddies as much as
downstream. The boatmen let us passengers
row occasionally in those calm stretches,
and I learned how elusive the current could
be a mere thread of water winding among
back eddies and upwells and sinks.
But mostly I was happy to just sit and
watch geology and hydrology happen or
not as we moved slowly through it all. The
bigness of the Grand Canyon is obvious
enough from postcards, and needs no further
comment it doesn't help descriptively
to use more sesquipedalian synonyms: massive,
monumental, stupendous, et cetera.
“Big” is a sufficient descriptor for that most
obvious quality of the Grand Canyon.
But what gradually came to me after a
few days was the fragility of it fragility on a scale that boggles the comprehension.
We would go past a piece of rock that had
cracked away from a wall and slipped twenty
feet or so, to sit partly in the water yet still
leaning against the wall but the piece of
rock was the size of a three-story building,
and one wondered how far up the opposite
wall the wave from its fall would have
washed our raft. It is all falling apart, down
there, but the parts are really (forgive me)
big although, eventually, they do all end
up as sand.
The river moves the sand along quickly
in places, ever so slowly in others and the
eddies pile it up against the walls, and seeds
blow in and try to anchor it, and boats full
of people with luggage land there and create
moveable civilization. But eventually it
rains harder and longer than usual, or rocks
roll around on the bottom and shift the current,
and that stirs the sand and it follows
the people on down the river. Everything is
moving on through except for the standing
waves in the river and the standing walls
above the river.
The really big walls the waterfalls spilled
over are limestone; the Grand Canyon alternates
thick layers of hard limestone with
sloping layers of softer shales and sandstones,
until you get down to the “basement”
schist and granite of the inner gorges.
At Lee’s Ferry, where most Grand Canyon
trips start, the layer of Kaibab limestone
emerges from under the sandstones of the
Colorado Plateau, rising out of the river itself
right there, then ascending as the river
descends until within a couple days it is only occasionally visible thousands of feet above
the river, capping the high plateau that bears
its name. But the most impressive formation
in the canyon, to this tourist anyway,
is the Redwall limestone the Redwall and
Temple formations together that create the
thousand-foot vertical walls over which
poured the high falls we saw the day of the
thousand thousand-foot waterfalls.
The rain finally stopped about midday,
and the sun began to break through the
clouds. We all pulled over onto a big shelf
of rock and heated up some water for instant
soup and tea to warm the innards
as the sun quickly took over the task of
warming up the outards. Rain gear came
off, polypro dried out and somewhere
during that flurry of activity, the waterfalls
stopped falling. And, except for the blood
tone of the river, it already seemed more
like something dreamed than something
remembered. Who could believe a thousand
thousand-foot waterfalls?
Several people on our journey were on
their second or third trip through the canyons.
Brad stopped counting about fifty
trips ago. But I am pretty sure my first trip
will be my last. Mostly, this is because, like
I said, I am not a water person. Everybody
needs to find a geography that fits, and
mine is the high valleys and mountains,
where the streams are small and many. Brad
Dimock’s is clearly the canyons; he is in all
ways thoroughly immersed in the canyon’s
river, knows its natural history and its human
history; his stories from his own history
in and with the canyon and its places
and people greatly enriched the experience
of being there for all of us.
But another reason for thinking, now at
least, that I don’t want to go back was the
day of the thousand thousand-foot waterfalls.
How could the river and its canyons
and the weather, that eternal collision of
earth air water fire, conspire or contend
more magnificently than that? Accept the
blessing; don’t push the luck. Next time I’ll
probably fall in.
George Sibley is a landlubber from Gunnison,
Colorado, and likes life high and dry. His
“patron” on this river trip, Brad Dimock of
Flagstaff, AZ, is also a contributor to Mountain
Gazette, and is a senior guide for Arizona
Raft Adventures of Flagstaff.